![]() ![]() Pairs of unacquainted participants ( n = 88 females = 52, males = 36) interacted for ten-minutes in one of three interaction conditions that sought to vary interaction demands by manipulating the degree to which participants were aware of judging and/or being judged. Specifically, the role of targets' self-presentation concerns and judges' information processing demands on accuracy for interpersonal traits (i.e., traits likely to be accentuated within an interpersonal context) and less interpersonal traits (i.e., traits less likely to be accentuated within an interpersonal context) was examined. The present study examined the role of target and judge interaction demands on first impression accuracy ( n = 195). Our conclusion is that, instead of competing against one another, related theoretical perspectives are best compared and integrated to improve scientific insight about complex phenomena, such as social evaluation. In this way, we show that the models can expand and enrich one another. In the second part, we combine the models’ premises and evidence bases to generate new insights about social evaluation. By making a systematic comparison in the first part of the chapter, we sharpen the aim and scope of the complementary models and research programs supporting them. A proper understanding of social evaluation must consider the models’ different types and numbers of perceivers, targets, and dimensions. This chapter compares five models that analyze social evaluation from the micro, interpersonal to macro, many-group level: the Dual Perspective Model (DPM), Behavioral Regulation Model (BRM), Dimensional Compensation Model (DCM), Stereotype Content Model (SCM), and Agency-Beliefs-Communion (ABC) Model. ![]() However, targets' prior chat room experience was consistently found to be a moderate predictor of likability. ![]() Targets' self-reported personality had little predictive power in determining who was liked in Internet chat rooms. Judges in group interactions tended to like the targets less and viewed them less favorably across all personality traits than did judges in one-on-one interactions. Unlike research using face-to-face interactions, consensus was highest and assimilation was lowest when participants interacted one-on-one. For extraversion and openness, this agreement corresponded with targets' self-perceptions. Using the Social Relations Model (Kenny, 1994), it was found that in one-on-one interactions, judges were able to achieve consensus for the targets' traits of extraversion, agreeableness, and openness. Participants were 156 undergraduate students who interacted in chat rooms for 15 min either one-on-one or in groups of six. Because millions of people use the Internet everyday to create and maintain interpersonal relationships, the current study investigated interpersonal perception in Internet chat rooms. Accurate personality judgments are important for successful interpersonal interactions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |